It took me a while to gather my thoughts and courage to blog about this, but given that I have heard from quite a few of readers about this, I decided it was about time. If you have been keeping up with the presidential campaign rhetoric you will have noticed that we (the planetarium subject) have broken through on the national political scene.
Let me first start on a cautionary word... for myself that is. The thing is: I need to stay neutral. As Executive Director I am trying to achieve this grand plan of building a planetarium and science museum for Austin, and I will be talking to a lot of people. Actually, that should be phrased as: A LOT OF PEOPLE: staggering numbers, of all walks of life and with a vast variety of backgrounds and opinions, and somehow I need to keep them all happy and pleased. This is Texas y'all, and Texans are not necessarily famous for keeping their opinions to themselves. But hey, I love a challenge, so…bring it on! Now again; I am not complaining; but needless to say, I better stay away from discussing politics.
This used to be quite easy, until last week when the second presidential debate took place, and Senator McCain blamed Senator Obama for introducing an earmark of three million dollars for a planetarium overhead projector for the Adler planetarium in Chicago, Illinois.
As it happened, I was at the Adler planetarium earlier this year and even
blogged about it. The Adler planetarium is a great facility, which is not too surprising given its history and location. Dang, can you imagine the Austin Planetarium being built on a 1000 ft pier into Lake Travis? (I for one would give my eye-teeth for that (imaginary) location) But I digress...
Checking the facts after the debate, Senator McCain was indeed correct that there was a three million earmark proposed for the Adler planetarium. However not for an overhead projector, but a whole overhead system, more commonly referred to as a full-dome system by planetarium insiders. Needless to say, the Chicago media jumped on this as well and interviewed my colleague at the Adler planetarium Dr. Paul Knappenburger
about this issue.
So... now the difficult part of this blog. Wouldn't it be wonderful if the Austin Planetarium were to receive three million dollars of taxpayers’ money to build this great educational facility? Do we deserve that? Do we deserve it more than, for example, Chicago, IL, which has already such a fantastic facility?
Well in my opinion, the short answer is: yes, that would be wonderful.
But the rub for me is that I am shocked that a city like Chicago, and a facility like the Adler Planetarium, would need a federal earmark like that. If they cannot raise money with an existing facility to prove what they can do with that money, and with a population more then four times the population of Austin proper... boy are we in trouble or what!?
So, although I selfishly support the earmark, I question it as well. I am sure there are many other planetarium facilities in the US that are in more dire need for funding then the Adler. Given that Austin is the largest city in the US
without a planetarium, I think we, most of all, would need (federal) help... Right?
The core of the issue though is whether or not there is enough support. If the Adler is unable to raise the needed three million, there is something wrong. Either their project does not warrant the cost, or they have not done their leg-work to see if things can be raised locally. I cannot come to any other conclusion.
So, the last thing I would like to ask of you when you read this is to make a statement:
show your support for our project! Together we can make the Austin Planetarium happen, and a lot of small donations is going a long way. Please consider signing up for a $25 per month donation, or even a $10 a month! Let's show that the Austin Planetarium is supported by us all!
PS Dear President McCain/Obama (alphabetical order if you were wondering) please ignore any and all statements above and please approve a three million dollar earmark for the Austin Planetarium. Thank you.